🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to employ a redrawn congressional map that is projected to include up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, handed down on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the delicate equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the new maps. It had ordered the state to employ the districts created after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Strong Opposition

In a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its ruling was crafted by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a breach of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Fight

This decision is part of a national fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican control. Usually, map-drawing takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create several more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas AG praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation aligned with his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

Conversely, opposition party representatives decried the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major party election organization.

Another leading Democratic leader said the court had once again shredded its credibility by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.