🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.